How This Evidence Evolved
Dual Antiplatelet Duration Post-PCI
Finding the sweet spot
Timeline
Early observations and pilot data that first suggested a new direction
Landmark RCTs and pivotal trials that established the evidence base
Net adverse clinical events: 2.4% vs 3.7% (p=0.04) favouring 1-month DAPT
BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding: HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.45–0.68), p<0.001 favouring ticagrelor monotherapy
Net adverse clinical events: HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.48–0.92) favouring ticagrelor monotherapy
Follow-up studies, subgroup analyses, and real-world validation
Current standard of care and ongoing research directions
Landmark Trials in This Story
Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents
Stent thrombosis: 0.4% vs 1.4% (p<0.001); major bleeding increased with longer DAPT
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial
Net adverse clinical events: 2.4% vs 3.7% (p=0.04) favouring 1-month DAPT
Ticagrelor alone vs. ticagrelor plus aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: TWILIGHT-ACS
BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding: HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.45–0.68), p<0.001 favouring ticagrelor monotherapy
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial
Net adverse clinical events: HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.48–0.92) favouring ticagrelor monotherapy
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI in Patients at High Bleeding Risk
Bleeding: HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.56–0.83) favouring abbreviated DAPT
Explore the evidence yourself
Ask AttendMe about any trial, guideline, or clinical question. Evidence-ranked answers from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.