How This Evidence Evolved
TBI Imaging Decision Rules
Reducing unnecessary CT scans
Timeline
Early observations and pilot data that first suggested a new direction
Landmark RCTs and pivotal trials that established the evidence base
100% sensitivity for neurosurgical intervention; 98.4% for clinically important brain injury
98.3% sensitivity for significant intracranial injury
Sensitivity >99% for clinically important TBI in children; CT rate reduction potential of 25%
Integration into clinical practice guidelines and recommendations
Canadian CT Head Rule criteria recommended for adult minor head injury
Age-stratified clinical prediction rules for paediatric minor head injury
Current standard of care and ongoing research directions
Landmark Trials in This Story
The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury
100% sensitivity for neurosurgical intervention; 98.4% for clinically important brain injury
Developing a decision instrument to guide computed tomographic imaging of blunt head injury patients
98.3% sensitivity for significant intracranial injury
Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study
Sensitivity >99% for clinically important TBI in children; CT rate reduction potential of 25%
Explore the evidence yourself
Ask AttendMe about any trial, guideline, or clinical question. Evidence-ranked answers from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.