All Pathways
Hepatobiliary SurgeryEmergency

Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025)

Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025): Bile Duct Injury Suspected → When Was Injury Recognized? → Intraoperative Recognition → Strasberg Classi...

Interactive Decision Tree

Mini Map

Algorithm Steps

  1. Start

    Bile Duct Injury Suspected

    During or after cholecystectomy

    1. Decision

      When Was Injury Recognized?

      Critical for management approach

      • INTRAOPERATIVE: Seen during surgery
      • EARLY POSTOP: Days 1-7
      • DELAYED: >7 days postop
      1. Action

        Intraoperative Recognition

        Best opportunity for repair

        • STOP - Do not attempt repair unless expert
        • Call hepatobiliary surgeon if available
        • Place drain near injury
        • Document injury location/extent
        • Obtain intraoperative cholangiogram
        • Consider conversion to open
        1. Action

          Strasberg Classification

          Classify injury type

          • TYPE A: Cystic duct leak or minor hepatic duct
          • TYPE B: Occlusion of aberrant RHD
          • TYPE C: Transection of aberrant RHD
          • TYPE D: Lateral injury to major duct
          • TYPE E1-E5: CHD/CBD transection
          • E1: >2cm from confluence
          • E2: <2cm from confluence
          • E3: At confluence
          • E4: Destruction of confluence
          • E5: Main hepatic duct + aberrant RHD
          1. Decision

            Sepsis or Peritonitis?

            Urgent intervention needed

            1. Warning

              Urgent Source Control

              Before definitive repair

              • Percutaneous drainage of collections
              • Antibiotics
              • Resuscitation
              • Do NOT attempt definitive repair in sepsis
              • Wait 6-12 weeks for inflammation to settle
              1. Decision

                Type of Injury?

                Guides management pathway

                1. Action

                  Type A: Cystic Duct/Minor Leak

                  Usually ERCP + stent

                  • ERCP with sphincterotomy ± stent
                  • Success rate: >90%
                  • Remove stent in 4-6 weeks
                  • If failed: PTC drainage
                  1. Action

                    Post-Repair Care

                    Long-term follow-up essential

                    • LFTs monthly x 6, then q3mo x 2 years
                    • MRCP at 6-12 months
                    • Watch for stricture (10-20%)
                    • Cholangitis warrants urgent workup
                    1. Outcome

                      Outcomes

                      Prognosis and statistics

                      • Type A leak: >95% success with ERCP
                      • Type E repair: 80-90% good outcome at expert center
                      • Stricture rate: 10-20%
                      • Referral timing correlates with outcome
                2. Action

                  Type D: Lateral Injury

                  ERCP or surgical repair

                  • Small lateral injury: ERCP + stent
                  • Larger injury: May need surgical repair
                  • Primary repair over T-tube if >50%
                  1. Decision

                    Concomitant Vascular Injury?

                    Worsens prognosis significantly

                    1. Warning

                      Vascular Injury Present

                      High morbidity, expert management

                      • Right hepatic artery: May need hepatectomy if ischemia
                      • Portal vein: Urgent repair needed
                      • Combined injury: Worst prognosis
                      • Consider transplant evaluation if extensive
                    2. Action

                      Surgical Repair Principles

                      Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy

                      • Healthy mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis
                      • Roux limb 60-70cm
                      • Single-layer absorbable sutures
                      • External drain near anastomosis
                3. Action

                  Type E: Complete Transection

                  Requires surgical reconstruction

                  • REFER TO HEPATOBILIARY CENTER
                  • Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy
                  • Timing: Early if no sepsis or delayed 6-12 weeks
                  • E3-E5 may need segment III approach
                  • Outcomes correlate with center volume
      2. Action

        Postoperative Workup

        If not recognized intraoperatively

        • Clinical signs: Pain, jaundice, fever, bilious drain
        • Labs: LFTs, bilirubin trending up
        • CT abdomen: Collection, biloma
        • MRCP: Delineate ductal anatomy
        • HIDA scan if subtle leak

Guideline Source

SAGES-AHPBA Guidelines for Management of Bile Duct Injury Following Cholecystectomy

Clinical Safety Information

Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment

Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Known Limitations

  • Strasberg classification may not capture all injury patterns
  • Optimal timing of repair debated
  • Requires hepatobiliary expertise
  • Vascular injury worsens prognosis significantly

Applicable Regions

USEU
Version 1Next review: 2027-01-11

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025)?

The Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025) is a emergency clinical algorithm for Hepatobiliary Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on SAGES-AHPBA Guidelines for Management of Bile Duct Injury Following Cholecystectomy.

What guideline is the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025) based on?

This algorithm is based on SAGES-AHPBA Guidelines for Management of Bile Duct Injury Following Cholecystectomy (DOI: N/A).

What are the limitations of the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025)?

Known limitations include: Strasberg classification may not capture all injury patterns; Optimal timing of repair debated; Requires hepatobiliary expertise; Vascular injury worsens prognosis significantly. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm

In AttendMe.ai, the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025) appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.

Try AttendMe Free