Bile Duct Injury Suspected
During or after cholecystectomy
All Pathways
Hepatobiliary SurgeryEmergency
Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025)
Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025): Bile Duct Injury Suspected → When Was Injury Recognized? → Intraoperative Recognition → Strasberg Classi...
Pathway Overview
16 steps
Algorithm Steps
16 total
01Start 02Decision When Was Injury Recognized?
Critical for management approach
- INTRAOPERATIVE: Seen during surgery
- EARLY POSTOP: Days 1-7
- DELAYED: >7 days postop
03Action Intraoperative Recognition
Best opportunity for repair
- STOP - Do not attempt repair unless expert
- Call hepatobiliary surgeon if available
- Place drain near injury
- Document injury location/extent
- Obtain intraoperative cholangiogram
- Consider conversion to open
04Action Strasberg Classification
Classify injury type
- TYPE A: Cystic duct leak or minor hepatic duct
- TYPE B: Occlusion of aberrant RHD
- TYPE C: Transection of aberrant RHD
- TYPE D: Lateral injury to major duct
- TYPE E1-E5: CHD/CBD transection
- E1: >2cm from confluence
- E2: <2cm from confluence
- E3: At confluence
- E4: Destruction of confluence
- E5: Main hepatic duct + aberrant RHD
05Decision Sepsis or Peritonitis?
Urgent intervention needed
06Warning Urgent Source Control
Before definitive repair
- Percutaneous drainage of collections
- Antibiotics
- Resuscitation
- Do NOT attempt definitive repair in sepsis
- Wait 6-12 weeks for inflammation to settle
07Decision Type of Injury?
Guides management pathway
08Action Type A: Cystic Duct/Minor Leak
Usually ERCP + stent
- ERCP with sphincterotomy ± stent
- Success rate: >90%
- Remove stent in 4-6 weeks
- If failed: PTC drainage
09Action Post-Repair Care
Long-term follow-up essential
- LFTs monthly x 6, then q3mo x 2 years
- MRCP at 6-12 months
- Watch for stricture (10-20%)
- Cholangitis warrants urgent workup
10Outcome Outcomes
Prognosis and statistics
- Type A leak: >95% success with ERCP
- Type E repair: 80-90% good outcome at expert center
- Stricture rate: 10-20%
- Referral timing correlates with outcome
11Action Type D: Lateral Injury
ERCP or surgical repair
- Small lateral injury: ERCP + stent
- Larger injury: May need surgical repair
- Primary repair over T-tube if >50%
12Decision Concomitant Vascular Injury?
Worsens prognosis significantly
13Warning Vascular Injury Present
High morbidity, expert management
- Right hepatic artery: May need hepatectomy if ischemia
- Portal vein: Urgent repair needed
- Combined injury: Worst prognosis
- Consider transplant evaluation if extensive
- Path rejoins step 09Shared downstream outcome
14Action Surgical Repair Principles
Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy
- Healthy mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis
- Roux limb 60-70cm
- Single-layer absorbable sutures
- External drain near anastomosis
- Path rejoins step 09Shared downstream outcome
15Action Type E: Complete Transection
Requires surgical reconstruction
- REFER TO HEPATOBILIARY CENTER
- Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy
- Timing: Early if no sepsis or delayed 6-12 weeks
- E3-E5 may need segment III approach
- Outcomes correlate with center volume
- Path rejoins step 12Shared downstream outcome
- Path rejoins step 07Shared downstream outcome
- Path rejoins step 04Shared downstream outcome
16Action Postoperative Workup
If not recognized intraoperatively
- Clinical signs: Pain, jaundice, fever, bilious drain
- Labs: LFTs, bilirubin trending up
- CT abdomen: Collection, biloma
- MRCP: Delineate ductal anatomy
- HIDA scan if subtle leak
- Path rejoins step 05Shared downstream outcome
Guideline Source
SAGES-AHPBA Guidelines for Management of Bile Duct Injury Following Cholecystectomy
Clinical Safety Information
Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment
Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.
Known Limitations
- Strasberg classification may not capture all injury patterns
- Optimal timing of repair debated
- Requires hepatobiliary expertise
- Vascular injury worsens prognosis significantly
Applicable Regions
USEU
Version 1Next review: 2027-01-11
Next steps
Finish the workflow by opening the most relevant calculator, then convert the session into a live account when you are ready.
Related Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025)?
The Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025) is a emergency clinical algorithm for Hepatobiliary Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on SAGES-AHPBA Guidelines for Management of Bile Duct Injury Following Cholecystectomy.
What guideline is the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025) based on?
This algorithm is based on SAGES-AHPBA Guidelines for Management of Bile Duct Injury Following Cholecystectomy (DOI: N/A).
What are the limitations of the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025)?
Known limitations include: Strasberg classification may not capture all injury patterns; Optimal timing of repair debated; Requires hepatobiliary expertise; Vascular injury worsens prognosis significantly. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.
Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm
In AttendMe.ai, the Bile Duct Injury Management (SAGES-AHPBA 2025) appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.
Try AttendMe Free