All Pathways
Colorectal SurgeryEmergency

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016)

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016): Suspected Ogilvie's Syndrome (ACPO) → Clinical Presentation → Diagnostic ...

Pathway Overview

15 steps

Algorithm Steps

15 total

  1. 01Start

    Suspected Ogilvie's Syndrome (ACPO)

    Colonic dilation without mechanical obstruction

  2. 02Action

    Clinical Presentation

    Typical features and risk factors

    • Massive abdominal distension
    • Absent or minimal pain (unless ischemia)
    • Nausea, vomiting
    • Obstipation (may still pass flatus)
    • RISK FACTORS:
    • - Post-operative (orthopedic, cardiac, spinal)
    • - Critical illness, sepsis
    • - Medications (opioids, anticholinergics)
    • - Electrolyte abnormalities
    • - Neurologic conditions
  3. 03Action

    Diagnostic Workup

    Exclude mechanical obstruction

    • CT abdomen/pelvis WITH contrast
    • Must rule out mechanical obstruction
    • Assess for: Transition point, mass, volvulus
    • Measure cecal diameter (critical)
    • Labs: Electrolytes (K, Mg, Ca), CBC
    • Water-soluble contrast enema if CT unclear
  4. 04Decision

    Signs of Perforation/Ischemia?

    Emergency surgery if present

    • Peritonitis
    • Free air
    • Cecal pneumatosis
    • Severe localized pain
  5. 05Warning

    EMERGENCY SURGERY

    Perforation or ischemia

    • Exploratory laparotomy
    • Right hemicolectomy if ischemic cecum
    • Subtotal colectomy if extensive
    • Primary anastomosis vs ileostomy
    • Mortality 30-50% with perforation
  6. 06Action

    Post-Treatment Care

    Prevent recurrence

    • Advance diet slowly
    • Continue bowel regimen
    • Mobilize patient
    • Monitor for recurrence (10-30%)
    • Address underlying cause
    • Repeat neostigmine if recurs
  7. 07Outcome

    Outcomes

    Prognosis

    • Overall mortality: 15-30%
    • With perforation: 30-50%
    • Recurrence: 10-30%
    • Most respond to conservative + neostigmine
  8. 08Decision

    Cecal Diameter Assessment

    Determines urgency of intervention

    • HIGH RISK: >12cm or >9cm for >3 days
    • Perforation risk increases significantly
  9. 09Action

    Conservative Management

    For cecum <12cm, <3 days duration

    • NPO, NG tube if vomiting
    • IV fluids, correct electrolytes
    • Discontinue opioids/anticholinergics
    • Mobilize patient if possible
    • Rectal tube (limited benefit)
    • Knee-chest position intermittently
    • Daily abdominal X-rays
    • Trial for 24-48 hours
  10. 10Decision

    Response to Conservative Rx?

    Reassess at 24-48 hours

  11. Path rejoins step 06Shared downstream outcome
  12. 11Action

    Neostigmine Administration

    Pharmacologic decompression

    • DOSE: 2mg IV over 3-5 minutes
    • MONITORING: Continuous cardiac (bradycardia risk)
    • Atropine at bedside
    • CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    • - Recent MI
    • - Bradycardia <60
    • - Active bronchospasm
    • - Mechanical obstruction not excluded
    • Response expected within 30 min
    • Can repeat once if partial response
  13. 12Decision

    Response to Neostigmine?

    Assess clinical/radiographic improvement

    • Success: 80-90%
    • Decompression within 30 min
    • May repeat once if partial response
  14. Path rejoins step 06Shared downstream outcome
  15. 13Action

    Colonoscopic Decompression

    If neostigmine fails or contraindicated

    • Minimal insufflation
    • Decompress to hepatic flexure
    • Place decompression tube
    • Suction as advancing
    • Success rate: 70-80%
    • Recurrence: 10-30%
    • Risk: Perforation 1-3%
  16. 14Decision

    Decompression Successful?

    Assess need for surgery

  17. Path rejoins step 06Shared downstream outcome
  18. 15Action

    Surgical Intervention

    For refractory cases

    • CECOSTOMY: Percutaneous or surgical
    • Decompresses without resection
    • For poor surgical candidates
    • RESECTION: If ischemia/perforation
    • Ileostomy vs anastomosis based on status
  19. Path rejoins step 06Shared downstream outcome
  20. Path rejoins step 11Shared downstream outcome

Guideline Source

ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction

Clinical Safety Information

Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment

Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Known Limitations

  • Neostigmine contraindicated with cardiac conditions
  • Requires cardiac monitoring
  • Multiple etiologies may coexist
  • Recurrence common

Applicable Regions

USEU
Version 1Next review: 2027-01-11

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016)?

The Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016) is a emergency clinical algorithm for Colorectal Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction.

What guideline is the Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016) based on?

This algorithm is based on ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000489).

What are the limitations of the Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016)?

Known limitations include: Neostigmine contraindicated with cardiac conditions; Requires cardiac monitoring; Multiple etiologies may coexist; Recurrence common. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm

In AttendMe.ai, the Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) Management (ASCRS 2016) appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.

Try AttendMe Free