All Pathways
General SurgeryEmergency

Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020)

Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020): Suspected Perforated Peptic Ulcer → Diagnostic Workup → Perforation Confirmed? → Initial Resuscitation →...

Interactive Decision Tree

Mini Map

Algorithm Steps

  1. Start

    Suspected Perforated Peptic Ulcer

    Sudden onset severe epigastric pain, board-like rigidity, peritonitis. History of PUD, NSAID use, or H. pylori. Consider in any patient with acute abdomen.

    1. Action

      Diagnostic Workup

      1) Erect CXR: Free air under diaphragm (70-80% sensitive). 2) CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast: Gold standard - extraluminal air, fluid, wall thickening. 3) Labs: CBC, BMP, lactate, amylase, type & screen. 4) ECG to rule out cardiac cause of epigastric pain.

      1. Decision

        Perforation Confirmed?

        CT showing free air + peritoneal fluid + ulcer crater. Clinical peritonitis with imaging findings. If uncertain, consider diagnostic laparoscopy.

        1. Action

          Initial Resuscitation

          1) NPO, NG tube for decompression. 2) IV fluids - crystalloid bolus. 3) Foley catheter. 4) Broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone + metronidazole or piperacillin-tazobactam). 5) PPI IV bolus then infusion. 6) Adequate analgesia. 7) Correct coagulopathy.

          1. Decision

            Risk Stratification (Boey Score)

            Boey score predicts mortality: 1) Delayed presentation >24h (+1). 2) Preoperative shock (SBP <90) (+1). 3) Severe comorbidities (ASA ≥3) (+1). Score 0: <2% mortality. Score 1: 8%. Score 2: 30%. Score 3: >50%.

            1. Decision

              Non-operative Management Candidate?

              RARELY appropriate. Consider ONLY if: 1) Sealed perforation on CT (contained leak). 2) No generalized peritonitis. 3) Hemodynamically stable. 4) Improving with conservative measures. 5) Contrast study shows no leak. High failure rate - close monitoring essential.

              1. Action

                Non-Operative Management

                1) NPO, NG tube. 2) IV antibiotics. 3) IV PPI. 4) Serial exams q4-6h. 5) Repeat imaging if deterioration. 6) Immediate surgery if no improvement in 12-24h. 7) Water-soluble contrast study before oral intake.

                1. Warning

                  ⚠️ Time is Critical

                  Every hour of delay beyond 6-12 hours increases mortality. Sepsis develops rapidly with untreated perforation. Non-operative management failure rate is high - low threshold to convert to surgery.

              2. Decision

                Operative Approach Selection

                Laparoscopic vs Open based on: Hemodynamic stability, surgeon expertise, perforation size, duration of symptoms, available resources.

                1. Action

                  Laparoscopic Repair

                  Preferred if: Hemodynamically stable, experienced surgeon, perforation <1cm, <24h duration. Procedure: 1) Thorough peritoneal lavage (>6L saline). 2) Primary closure with omental (Graham) patch. 3) Suture or pledgeted repair. Benefits: Less pain, shorter stay, fewer wound complications.

                  1. Action

                    Postoperative Management

                    1) Continue IV PPI. 2) Continue antibiotics 3-5 days. 3) NG tube until bowel function returns. 4) H. pylori testing and eradication. 5) NSAID cessation counseling. 6) Follow-up EGD in 6-8 weeks for gastric ulcers (rule out malignancy).

                    1. Outcome

                      Successful Repair

                      Patient recovered. Continue PPI, H. pylori eradication, avoid NSAIDs. Follow-up EGD for gastric ulcers.

                    2. Outcome

                      Monitor for Complications

                      Watch for: Leak, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, ileus, gastric outlet obstruction, recurrent ulcer.

                2. Action

                  Open Repair (Laparotomy)

                  Indications: Hemodynamically unstable, large perforation (>2cm), shock, delayed presentation, no laparoscopic expertise. Procedure: Upper midline incision, thorough lavage, omental patch repair. Consider definitive ulcer surgery (vagotomy, antrectomy) for recurrent disease if patient stable.

                3. Action

                  Giant Perforation (>2cm)

                  Options: 1) Omental plug with multiple sutures. 2) Partial gastrectomy (Billroth I or II) for gastric ulcers. 3) Jejunal serosal patch (Thal patch). 4) Roux-en-Y reconstruction. 5) Damage control if unstable (pack and return).

Guideline Source

WSES Guidelines: Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcer

Clinical Safety Information

Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment

Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Known Limitations

  • Non-operative management rarely appropriate - use with caution
  • Elderly and immunocompromised may have atypical presentations
  • Local surgical expertise affects approach selection
  • Does not cover giant perforations (>2cm) in detail
  • Pediatric perforations require specialized consideration

Contraindicated Populations

pediatric

Applicable Regions

USEUGlobal

Global: WSES 2020 guidelines widely adopted for PPU management

Version 1Next review: 2028-01-01

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020)?

The Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020) is a emergency clinical algorithm for General Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on WSES Guidelines: Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcer.

What guideline is the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020) based on?

This algorithm is based on WSES Guidelines: Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcer (DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0283-9).

What are the limitations of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020)?

Known limitations include: Non-operative management rarely appropriate - use with caution; Elderly and immunocompromised may have atypical presentations; Local surgical expertise affects approach selection; Does not cover giant perforations (>2cm) in detail; Pediatric perforations require specialized consideration. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm

In AttendMe.ai, the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020) appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.

Try AttendMe Free