Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020)
Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020): Suspected Perforated Peptic Ulcer → Diagnostic Workup → Perforation Confirmed? → Initial Resuscitation →...
Interactive Decision Tree
Algorithm Steps
- ▶Start
Suspected Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Sudden onset severe epigastric pain, board-like rigidity, peritonitis. History of PUD, NSAID use, or H. pylori. Consider in any patient with acute abdomen.
- ●Action
Diagnostic Workup
1) Erect CXR: Free air under diaphragm (70-80% sensitive). 2) CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast: Gold standard - extraluminal air, fluid, wall thickening. 3) Labs: CBC, BMP, lactate, amylase, type & screen. 4) ECG to rule out cardiac cause of epigastric pain.
- ◆Decision
Perforation Confirmed?
CT showing free air + peritoneal fluid + ulcer crater. Clinical peritonitis with imaging findings. If uncertain, consider diagnostic laparoscopy.
- ●Action
Initial Resuscitation
1) NPO, NG tube for decompression. 2) IV fluids - crystalloid bolus. 3) Foley catheter. 4) Broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone + metronidazole or piperacillin-tazobactam). 5) PPI IV bolus then infusion. 6) Adequate analgesia. 7) Correct coagulopathy.
- ◆Decision
Risk Stratification (Boey Score)
Boey score predicts mortality: 1) Delayed presentation >24h (+1). 2) Preoperative shock (SBP <90) (+1). 3) Severe comorbidities (ASA ≥3) (+1). Score 0: <2% mortality. Score 1: 8%. Score 2: 30%. Score 3: >50%.
- ◆Decision
Non-operative Management Candidate?
RARELY appropriate. Consider ONLY if: 1) Sealed perforation on CT (contained leak). 2) No generalized peritonitis. 3) Hemodynamically stable. 4) Improving with conservative measures. 5) Contrast study shows no leak. High failure rate - close monitoring essential.
- ●Action
Non-Operative Management
1) NPO, NG tube. 2) IV antibiotics. 3) IV PPI. 4) Serial exams q4-6h. 5) Repeat imaging if deterioration. 6) Immediate surgery if no improvement in 12-24h. 7) Water-soluble contrast study before oral intake.
- ⚠Warning
⚠️ Time is Critical
Every hour of delay beyond 6-12 hours increases mortality. Sepsis develops rapidly with untreated perforation. Non-operative management failure rate is high - low threshold to convert to surgery.
- ◆Decision
Operative Approach Selection
Laparoscopic vs Open based on: Hemodynamic stability, surgeon expertise, perforation size, duration of symptoms, available resources.
- ●Action
Laparoscopic Repair
Preferred if: Hemodynamically stable, experienced surgeon, perforation <1cm, <24h duration. Procedure: 1) Thorough peritoneal lavage (>6L saline). 2) Primary closure with omental (Graham) patch. 3) Suture or pledgeted repair. Benefits: Less pain, shorter stay, fewer wound complications.
- ●Action
Postoperative Management
1) Continue IV PPI. 2) Continue antibiotics 3-5 days. 3) NG tube until bowel function returns. 4) H. pylori testing and eradication. 5) NSAID cessation counseling. 6) Follow-up EGD in 6-8 weeks for gastric ulcers (rule out malignancy).
- ✓Outcome
Successful Repair
Patient recovered. Continue PPI, H. pylori eradication, avoid NSAIDs. Follow-up EGD for gastric ulcers.
- ✓Outcome
Monitor for Complications
Watch for: Leak, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, ileus, gastric outlet obstruction, recurrent ulcer.
- ●Action
Open Repair (Laparotomy)
Indications: Hemodynamically unstable, large perforation (>2cm), shock, delayed presentation, no laparoscopic expertise. Procedure: Upper midline incision, thorough lavage, omental patch repair. Consider definitive ulcer surgery (vagotomy, antrectomy) for recurrent disease if patient stable.
- ●Action
Giant Perforation (>2cm)
Options: 1) Omental plug with multiple sutures. 2) Partial gastrectomy (Billroth I or II) for gastric ulcers. 3) Jejunal serosal patch (Thal patch). 4) Roux-en-Y reconstruction. 5) Damage control if unstable (pack and return).
Guideline Source
WSES Guidelines: Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcer
Clinical Safety Information
Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment
Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.
Known Limitations
- Non-operative management rarely appropriate - use with caution
- Elderly and immunocompromised may have atypical presentations
- Local surgical expertise affects approach selection
- Does not cover giant perforations (>2cm) in detail
- Pediatric perforations require specialized consideration
Contraindicated Populations
Applicable Regions
Global: WSES 2020 guidelines widely adopted for PPU management
Next steps
Finish the workflow by opening the most relevant calculator, then convert the session into a live account when you are ready.
Calculator
Caprini VTE Risk Score
Venous thromboembolism risk assessment for surgical patients
Compare
AttendMe.ai vs BMJ Best Practice
See how this pathway workflow compares against BMJ Best Practice.
Commercial
Start free
Run the pathway in a live AttendMe account with citations and tracked usage.
Related Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020)?
The Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020) is a emergency clinical algorithm for General Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on WSES Guidelines: Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcer.
What guideline is the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020) based on?
This algorithm is based on WSES Guidelines: Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcer (DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0283-9).
What are the limitations of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020)?
Known limitations include: Non-operative management rarely appropriate - use with caution; Elderly and immunocompromised may have atypical presentations; Local surgical expertise affects approach selection; Does not cover giant perforations (>2cm) in detail; Pediatric perforations require specialized consideration. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.
Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm
In AttendMe.ai, the Perforated Peptic Ulcer Management (WSES 2020) appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.
Try AttendMe Free