All Pathways
Critical CareManagement

VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS

VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS: Severe ARDS - Consider ECMO → Optimal Conventional Therapy Attempted? → Optimize Conventional Therapy First → Me...

Interactive Decision Tree

Mini Map

Algorithm Steps

  1. Start

    Severe ARDS - Consider ECMO

    P/F <80 despite optimal conventional therapy

    1. Decision

      Optimal Conventional Therapy Attempted?

      ECMO is rescue, not replacement

      • Lung protective ventilation
      • Prone positioning attempted
      • Adequate sedation/paralysis
      • PEEP optimization
      1. Action

        Optimize Conventional Therapy First

        ECMO is not indicated yet

        • Prone positioning if not done
        • Trial of NMBA
        • PEEP titration
        • Treat underlying cause
        1. Decision

          Meets ECMO Indications?

          ELSO/ATS criteria

          • P/F <80 for >6h despite optimal care
          • OR P/F <50 for >3h
          • OR pH <7.25 with PaCO2 >60 for >6h
          • Potentially reversible etiology
          1. Decision

            Check Contraindications

            Absolute and relative

            1. Warning

              ⚠️ Absolute Contraindications

              ECMO not appropriate

              • Irreversible underlying disease
              • Unrecoverable neurologic injury
              • Uncontrolled bleeding
              • Contraindication to anticoagulation
              • Advanced malignancy/end-stage organ failure
              1. Outcome

                Continue Without ECMO

                Supportive care, reassess prognosis

            2. Action

              Relative Contraindications - Discuss

              Case-by-case ECMO center decision

              • Age >65 (relative, not absolute)
              • BMI >40 (cannulation challenges)
              • Prolonged mechanical ventilation >7 days
              • Immunocompromised (consider)
              • Prior CPR (assess neuro status)
              1. Action

                Calculate RESP Score

                Prognostic tool - not deterministic

                • Age, immunocompromise, MV duration
                • Diagnosis, CNS dysfunction
                • Acute associated conditions
                • Score correlates with survival
                • Class I (≥6): ~92% survival
                • Class V (≤-6): ~18% survival
                1. Action

                  Contact ECMO Center EARLY

                  Do not wait until patient is moribund

                  • Call before patient deteriorates further
                  • Discuss candidacy with ECMO team
                  • Prepare for potential transfer
                  • Mobile ECMO teams may cannulate remotely
                  1. Decision

                    ECMO Center Decision

                    Accept for ECMO?

                    1. Action

                      Transfer/Cannulation for ECMO

                      Coordinate with ECMO team

                      • Mobile ECMO team may travel to patient
                      • Cannulate before transport if unstable
                      • Femoral or IJ cannulation (VV)
                      • Initial flows 3-4 L/min, titrate
                      1. Outcome

                        On VV-ECMO

                        Continue at ECMO center

                    2. Action

                      Not ECMO Candidate

                      Continue aggressive conventional care

                      • Maximize conventional therapies
                      • Goals of care discussion
                      • Palliative care consultation if appropriate

Guideline Source

An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: ATS Clinical Practice Guideline

Clinical Safety Information

Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment

Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Known Limitations

  • Requires ECMO center - early referral essential
  • Resource-intensive, limited availability
  • RESP score is prognostic, not diagnostic
  • Does not replace clinical judgment
  • Transport logistics may limit access

Contraindicated Populations

pediatric

Applicable Regions

USEUGlobal

Global: ELSO guidelines + ATS 2024

Version 1Next review: 2028-01-01

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS?

The VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS is a management clinical algorithm for Critical Care. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: ATS Clinical Practice Guideline.

What guideline is the VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS based on?

This algorithm is based on An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: ATS Clinical Practice Guideline (DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2011ST).

What are the limitations of the VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS?

Known limitations include: Requires ECMO center - early referral essential; Resource-intensive, limited availability; RESP score is prognostic, not diagnostic; Does not replace clinical judgment; Transport logistics may limit access. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm

In AttendMe.ai, the VV-ECMO Evaluation for Refractory ARDS appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.

Try AttendMe Free